This paper examines the distribution of environmental burdens in product carbon footprints (PCFs) and Scope 3.1 accounting. When a single process yields multiple outputs, an allocation procedure is required to attribute impacts like GHG emissions and water consumption among those outputs. Since methodological choices significantly influence comparative studies and environmental claims, selecting a transparent approach aligned with ISO 14044 is critical for maintaining LCA credibility.
To address limitations in industry guidance, which typically covers only primary processing, this document introduces a systematic "proxy-economic" allocation approach. Designed to fill data gaps for the global food system, this methodology uses market-value classifications to estimate impacts for ingredients where standard factors are missing. By formalizing the proxy logic often used implicitly in agricultural reports, it provides a consistent, scalable framework for an entire ingredient library.
Download this document for a technical roadmap on post-harvest allocation of land management, transportation, and land use change (LUC). It establishes a clear hierarchy for impact distribution and provides practical guidance through worked examples and comparative analyses of different allocation methods. This methodology offers a vital path forward for aligning the agri-food community on how to scale carbon accounting when industry-standard data is unavailable.






